False Prophets
For many years Christianity has been under constant, bitter and treacherous attack, until the major churches are now in disorganized retreat. The attacks, by those who are openly atheists or communists, have done little damage. It couldn�t appeal to anyone but our enemies, in any event. THE MOST VICIOUS ATTACK, AND THE MOST SUCCESSFUL, HAS COME FROM MEN WHO HAVE GAINED HIGH POSITIONS OF POWER IN CHURCH HIERARCHIES. THEY HAVE USED THIS POWER TO DESTROY EVERYTHING THAT BROUGHT CHRISTIANITY GREATNESS AND KEPT IT GREAT. It is the old Marxist strategy of infiltration and destroying from within.
Men such as: Binny Hinn; Bill Bright; Billy Graham (Jew); Bob Jones III; Hal Lindsey (Jew); Jack van Impe; James Robison; James Dobson; Jerry Falwell (A so-called Christian Zionist); Jim Bakker (Jew); Jimmy Swaggart; John Hagee; Kenneth Copelan; Kenny� Hagin; Marilyn Hickey; Marlin Maddoux; Mary Baker� Eddy; Mike Evans (Jew); Norman Vincent� Peale; Oral Roberts; Pat Robertson; Paul Crouch; R.J. Rushdoony; Randall Terry; Reed Irvine; Robert Schuler; V.W. Grant; Dr. Wolf (Jew).
THE FIRST STEP OF THIS PLOT WAS TO KEEP THE CHURCH CONGREGATIONS IGNORANT OF THE REAL BIBLICAL BASIS FOR CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. The average person has no training in analysis of the Bible. Even if they wished to, they could not spare the great amount of time necessary for the years of studies, which are required.
Let�s face it; the average person doesn�t have the capacity to undertake such a study independently. They must trust their minister to give them the results in a predigested form. However, his trust is far too often betrayed. How much of what is actually in the Bible were you ever taught in your church? Think back over your own church going experience. How many Sundays did your minister ever tell you what was in more than just one verse of the Bible?
Remember, he took just one verse as his text. That is the point of departure at which he left the Bible, never to return to it during that sermon. The rest of the sermon may have caused you to admire the cleverness of the man. However, when did he give you word for word, what the Bible itself said?
We remember noticing, just a few months ago, that the text for the Sunday morning sermon, in one of the great churches here in southern California was, �The Horse That Played Baseball�!! Naturally, we wouldn�t expect a modernist minister to know anything about the Old Testament. He would be strangely proud of his ignorance saying he was a New Testament Christian. Very well, let him produce the verse in the New Testament where he found the text for that sermon!!
In a library, we found eleven different translations of the Old Testament and twenty‑one different translations of the New Testament. It is not possible to find the text for that ridiculous sermon, in any of these translations. Was it possibly an attempt to amuse the congregation, in the hope of getting more of them to attend the services? People could get enough amusement at the movies, but where can they hear the word of Yahweh, instead of the word of man, if they can�t get it at their churches?
The first step of the plot is, to keep the congregations ignorant of what is really in the Bible. Go to almost any church you may select, and you will see an obvious success of keeping the congregations in� ignorance. THE NEXT STEP IS TO FILL THIS VACUUM, CREATED BY THESE FALSEHOODS, WITH FALSE DOCTRINES, WHICH ARE NOT DERIVED FROM THE BIBLE. ANY MAN MADE DOCTRINE CAN BE DRESSED UP PLAUSIBLY IN NICE WORDS. Look at communism for example, you know how they actually behave in every country they control.
You know the brutal massacre of whole classes of the population, and the degrading slavery and poverty they force upon those who are allowed to survive. You certainly don�t find any of this in communist literature. They talk as though communism were the most compassionate, generous and warm‑hearted movement, which has ever existed. (THEY DON�T TELL YOU OF THE MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS THAT THE JEWS THROUGH COMMUNISM MURDERED IN RUSSIA AND EASTERN EUROPE DO THEY; no because they are scared to death of the Jews and their power) Man made doctrines can also be dressed up in nice words and then passed as religion, and so they are.
The process is simple and familiar. First they attack the existing social institutions of our civilization as cruel and evil. When this comes from your minister, the man you have been taught to regard as a man of Yahweh, it is very easy for him to give you a guilt complex about every actual virtue you may have.
THE LYING JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MINISTERS PREACH THAT YOU ARE SELFISH, BECAUSE YOU LOVE THE MEMBERS OF YOUR OWN FAMILY MORE THAN YOU LOVE THE PEOPLE WHO WOULD REDUCE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO A JUNGLE. A PLACE WHERE NO WOMAN IS SAFE DAY OR NIGHT, even in the corridors of the government buildings. THESE LYING, DECEIVING MINISTER AND PRIESTS PREACH YOU ARE WICKED AND UNCHRISTIAN BECAUSE YOU DON�T WANT TO BRING THIS BLIGHT INTO YOUR OWN NEIGHBORHOODS, AND MAKE IT A MENACE TO YOUR OWN CHILDREN. When your own minister, the man you have been led to trust tells you this, it is hard to avoid a sense of guilt.
THOSE WHO HAVE PREACHED SUCH THINGS TO YOU ARE FALSE PROPHETS, WHO BRING YOU ACTUALLY SATANIC DOCTRINES, UNDER THE FALSE GUISE OF CHRISTIANITY.
These lying, deceiving, false prophets goals are spelled out in the following, taken from the Protocols of Zion:
WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE GOYIM, AND THEREBY TO RUIN THEIR MISSION ON EARTH WHICH IN THESE DAYS MIGHT STILL BE A GREAT HINDRANCE TO US. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT HATED CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress.
If you will only think for yourselves you will quickly see the following is being implemented in the churches of America today, and on the television screens, and in the movies, and television movies and etc.
Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought; by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light upon surrounding facts.
What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from the two points of view, that of ourselves and that of the goyim (i.e., non‑Jews).
It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by VIOLENCE and TERRORIZATION, and NOT BY ACADEMIC DISCUSSIONS. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.
What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men? What has served for their guidance hitherto?
In the beginnings of the structure of society they were subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards; to Law, which is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature right lies in force.
POLITICAL FREEDOM IS AN IDEA BUT NOT A FACT. THIS IDEA ONE MUST KNOW HOW TO APPLY WHENEVER IT APPEARS NECESSARY WITH THIS BAIT OF AN IDEA TO ATTRACT THE MASSES OF THE PEOPLE TO ONE�S PARTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CRUSHING ANOTHER WHO IS IN AUTHORITY. THIS TASK IS RENDERED EASIER IF THE OPPONENT HAS HIMSELF BEEN INFECTED WITH THE IDEA OF FREEDOM, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, AND, FOR THE SAKE OF AN IDEA, IS WILLING TO YIELD SOME OF HIS POWER. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because THE BLIND MIGHT OF THE NATION CANNOT FOR ONE SINGLE DAY EXIST WITHOUT GUIDANCE, AND THE NEW AUTHORITY MERELY FITS INTO THE PLACE OF THE OLD ALREADY WEAKENED BY LIBERALISM.
In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.
Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes; in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost; it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy‑nilly, must take hold of: if not; it goes to the bottom.
Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as the above are immoral I would put the following questions: If every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defense, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then it what way can the same means in regard to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible?
Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more favor with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, customs, traditions and sentimental theories, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, is its ignorance of political secrets puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.
THE POLITICAL HAS NOTHING IN COMMON WITH THE MORAL. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. HE WHO WISHES TO RULE MUST HAVE RECOURSE BOTH TO CUNNING AND TO MAKE-BELIEVE. GREAT NATIONAL QUALITIES, LIKE FRANKNESS AND HONESTY, ARE VICES IN POLITICS, FOR THEY BRING DOWN RULERS FROM THEIR THRONES MORE EFFECTIVELY AND MORE CERTAINLY THAN THE MOST POWERFUL ENEMY. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, but we must in no wise be guided by them.
Our right lies in force. The word �right� is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.
Where does right begin? Where does it end?
In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism. I find a new right; to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism.
OUR POWER IN THE PRESENT TOTTERING CONDITION OF ALL FORMS OF POWER WILL BE MORE INVINCIBLE THAN ANY OTHER, BECAUSE IT WILL REMAIN INVISIBLE UNTIL THE MOMENT WHEN IT HAS GAINED SUCH STRENGTH THAT NO CUNNING CAN ANY LONGER UNDERMINE IT.
Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will destroy the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to nought by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.
BEFORE US IS A PLAN IN WHICH IS LAID DOWN STRATEGICALLY THE LINE FROM WHICH WE CANNOT DEVIATE WITHOUT RUNNING THE RISK OF SEEING THE LABOR OF MANY CENTURIES BROUGHT TO NAUGHT.
In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE MIGHT OF A MOB IS BLIND, SENSELESS AND UNREASONING FORCE EVER AT THE MERCY OF A SUGGESTION FROM ANY SIDE. THE BLIND CANNOT LEAD THE BLIND WITHOUT BRINGING THEM INTO THE ABYSS; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.
Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet.
�The founding prophet of the leftist faith, Karl Marx, was born in 1818, the son of a Jewish father who changed his name from Herschel to Heinrich and converted to Christianity to advance his career. The young Marx grew into a man consumed by hatred for Christianity. Internationalizing the worst antichrist stereotypes, he incorporated them into his early revolutionary vision, identifying Jews as symbols of the system of private property and bourgeois democracy he wanted to further. �The god of the Jews had been secularized and has become the god of this world,� Marx wrote. �MONEY IS THE JEALOUS GOD OF THE JEWS, BESIDE WHICH NO OTHER GOD MAY STAND.� ONCE THE REVOLUTION SUCCEEDS IN DESTROYING THE EMPIRICAL ESSENCE OF CHRISTIANITY, he promised, �THE JEWS WILL BECOME THE RULERS OF THE WORLD This early Marxist formulation is the transparent seed of the mature vision, causing Paul Johnson to characterize Marxism as �the antichristian of the intellectuals.�
�The international Communist creed that Marx invented is a creed of hate. The solution that Marx proposed to the Christian �problem� was to eliminate the system that �creates� the Christian. The Jews, he said, �are only symptoms of a more extensive evil that must eradicate capitalism. The Jews are only symbols of a more pervasive enemy that must be destroyed; capitalists.�
�In the politics of the left, racist hatred is directed not only against Christian capitalists but against all capitalists; not only against capitalists, but anyone who is not poor, and who is White; and ultimately against Western Civilization itself. The Marxist revolution is antichrist elevated to a global principle.� (David Horowitz, Human Events)
A people left to itself, i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power and honors and the disorders arising therefrom. Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgments, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interests? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable, for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.
It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State; from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is a� save and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery.
BEHOLD THE ALCOHOLIZED ANIMALS, BEMUSED WITH DRINK AND DRUGS, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. THE PEOPLES OF THE GOYIM (non-Jews) ARE BEMUSED WITH ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS (and drugs); THEIR YOUTH HAS GROWN STUPID ON CLASSICISM AND FROM EARLY IMMORALITY, INTO WHICH IT HAS BEEN INDUCTED BY OUR SPECIAL AGENTS, BY TUTORS (teachers), LACKEYS, GOVERNESSES IN THE HOUSE OF THE WEALTHY, BY CLERKS AND OTHERS, BY OUR WOMEN IN THE PLACES OF DISSIPATION FREQUENTED BY THE GOYIM. In the number of these last I could also the so‑called �society ladies� voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury.
Our countersign is, Force and Make‑believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning the make‑believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.
Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State; not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and make‑believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our Super‑ Government (U.N.). It is enough for them to know that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease.
FAR BACK IN ANCIENT TIMES WE WERE THE FIRST TO CRY AMONG THE MASSES OF THE PEOPLE THE WORDS �LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY,� WORDS MANY TIMES REPEATED SINCE THOSE DAYS BY STUPID POLL-PARROTS WHO FROM ALL SIDES ROUND FLEW DOWN UPON THESE BAITS AND WITH THEM CARRIED AWAY THE WELL-BEING OF THE WORLD, TRUE FREEDOM OF THE INDIVIDUAL, FORMERLY SO WELL GUARDED AGAINST THE PRESSURE OF THE MOB. The would‑be wise men of the goyim, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness; did not note the contradiction of their meaning and interrelation; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom; that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws; never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non‑adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political, to all these things the goyim paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested; the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.
IN ALL CORNERS OF THE EARTH THE WORDS �LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY� BROUGHT TO OUR RANKS, THANKS TO OUR BLIND AGENTS, WHOSE LEGIONS WHO BORE OUR BANNERS WITH ENTHUSIASM. AND ALL THE TIME THESE WORDS WERE CANKER-WORMS AT WORK BORING INTO THE WELL-BEING OF THE GOYIM, PUTTING AN END EVERYWHERE TO PEACE, QUIET, SOLIDARITY AND DESTROYING ALL THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE GOYA STATES. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph; it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card, the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.
OUR TRIUMPH HAS BEEN RENDERED EASIER BY THE FACT THAT IN OUR RELATIONS WITH THE MEN WHOM WE WANTED TO HAVE ALWAYS WORKED UPON THE MOST SENSITIVE CHORDS OF THE HUMAN MIND, UPON THE CASH ACCOUNT, UPON THE CUPIDITY, UPON THE INSATIABILITY FOR MATERIAL NEEDS OF MAN; AND EACH ONE OF THESE HUMAN WEAKNESSES, TAKEN ALONE, IS SUFFICIENT TO PARALYZE INITIATIVE, FOR IT HANDS OVER THE WILL OF MEN TO THE DISPOSITION OF HIM WHO HAS BOUGHT THEIR ACTIVITIES.
The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn‑out glove.
It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed them at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.
�Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington�s surrender: �And many of the people of the land became Jews.� (Esther 9:17) The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.
�Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that �a holy war will now begin in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.� Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: �Your churches will be used to teach the Jew�s religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire [under the control of the Jews]. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all‑seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry [Lucifer ‑ as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma].� And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.�
Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of World Catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. WHAT HE PREDICTED HAS COME TO PASS!!! Of that, there is no longer any doubt. A brief study of American religious history will show that Masonry and Judaism has infused into every church in America their veiled Phallic Religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell [both Jews] started Jehovah Witnesses� in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity.
When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place.
�A Spanish Basque [a Jew] whose name was Lopez DeRecalde, but who preferred to be called Ignatuis Loyola, CONVINCED THE PAPACY he could build an army of Priests COMPLETELY DEDICATED TO DISCIPLINE AND ORDER and they soon became the most dreaded religious strike force in history.
�They were the special forces of the Vatican. This Papal police force was called �The Society of Jesus,� or �The Jesuits.� Their job was/is to make all things subservient to �The Pope, he alone is supreme and worshipful.� The Jesuit General is referred to as the �BLACK POPE� and IT IS HE WHO ACTUALLY RUNS THE VATICAN BEHIND THE SCENES EVEN TODAY. (The Godfathers, Chick Publication, page 9)
�The idea of God, the image of God, such as it is reflected in the Bible, goes through three distinct phases. The first stage is the Higher Being, thirsty for blood, jealous, terrible, war‑like. The intercourse between the Hebrew and his God is that of an inferior with s superior whom he fears and seeks to appease.
�The second phase the conditions are becoming more equal. The pact concluded between God and Abraham develops its consequences, and the intercourse becomes, so to speak, according to stipulation. In the Talmudic Hagada, the Patriarchs engage in controversies and judicial arguments with the Lord. The Tora and the Bible enter into these debate and their intervention is preponderant. God pleading against Israel sometimes loses the lawsuit. The equality of the contracting parties is asserted. Finally the third phase the subjectively divine character of God is lost. God becomes a kind of fictitious Being. These very legends, one of which we have just quoted, for those who know the keen minds of the authors, give the impression, that THEY, like their readers, of their listeners, LOOK UPON GOD IN THE MANNER OF A FICTITIOUS BEING AND DIVINITY, AT HEART, FROM THE ANGLE OF A PERSONIFICATION, OF A SYMBOL OF THE RACE [This religion has a code: THE TALMUD].� (Kadmi Cohen, Nomades, p. 138; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, 197‑198)
The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the patriarch of an international Church.
But, in the meantime, while we are re‑educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, we shall not overtly lay a finger on existing churches, but WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM...
In general, then, OUR CONTEMPORARY PRESS WILL CONTINUE TO CONVICT STATE AFFAIRS, RELIGIONS {Christianity}, INCAPACITIES OF THE GOYIM, ALWAYS USING THE MOST UNPRINCIPLED EXPRESSIONS IN ORDER BY EVERY MEANS TO LOWER THEIR PRESTIGE IN THE MANNER WHICH CAN ONLY BE PRACTICED BY THE GENIUS OF OUR GIFTED TRIBE...
�We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence on our press, radio, and motion pictures. It may become very serious. (Fulton) Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual System if a certain feature was permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.� (Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941)
Our kingdom will be an apologia of the divinity of Vishnu, in whom is found its personification, in our hundred hands will be, one in each, the springs of the machinery of social life. We shall see everything without the aid of official police which, in that scope of its rights which we elaborated for the use of the goyim, hinders governments from seeing. In our programme one third of our subjects WILL KEEP THE REST UNDER OBSERVATION FROM A SENSE OF DUTY, ON THE PRINCIPLE OF VOLUNTEER SERVICE TO THE STATE. {Now you know why there are so many TV shows such as �Most Wanted,��Cops,� and other such shows asking the audience to watch for the wanted criminal}. It will then be no disgrace to be a spy and informer, but a merit: UNFOUNDED DENUNCIATIONS, however, will be cruelly punished that there may be no development of abuses of this right.
Our agents will be taken from the higher as well as the lower ranks of society, from among the administrative class who spend their time in amusements, editors, printers and publishers, book sellers, clerks, and salesmen, workmen, coachmen, lackeys, etc. This body, having no rights and not being empowered to take any action on their own account, and consequently a police without any power, will only witness and report: verification of their reports and arrests will depend upon a responsible group of controllers of police affairs, while the actual act of arrest will be performed by the gendarmerie and the municipal police. Any person not denouncing anything seen or heard concerning questions of polity will also be charged with and made responsible for concealment, if it be proved that he is guilty of this crime.
�You {non‑Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money‑ grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
�We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and WE ARE THE ARCH‑PLOTTERS OF UNIVERSAL WARS AND THE CHIEF BENEFICIARIES OF THOSE WARS. We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...
�You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?... You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But WHAT IS THAT COMPARED TO OUR STAGGERING INFLUENCE IN YOUR CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, YOUR LAWS AND YOUR GOVERNMENT, AND THE VERY THOUGHTS YOU THINK EVERY DAY?...
��The Protocols of the Elders of Zion� which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. ALL RIGHT...WE WILL UNDERWRITE EVERY WORD OF IT. IT IS GENUINE AND AUTHENTIC. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?
�If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...
�YOU HAVE NOT BEGUN TO APPRECIATE THE REAL DEPTH OF OUR GUILT. WE ARE INTRUDERS. WE ARE SUBVERTERS. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. WE {Jews} HAVE BEEN AT THE BOTTOM OF NOT MERELY OF THE LATEST WAR {WWI} BUT OF NEARLY ALL YOUR WARS, NOT ONLY OF THE RUSSIAN BUT OF EVERY OTHER MAJOR REVOLUTION IN YOUR HISTORY. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...
�Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone. But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. WE CONQUERED YOU as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
�Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. WE STILL DOMINATE YOU...
�Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien faith {Judeo‑Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at cross‑purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill‑at‑ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires...
�So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain about the Jew�s influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. THE INFLUENCE, on the other hand, IS certainly THERE, and IT IS VASTLY GREATER AND MORE INSIDIOUS THAN YOU APPEAR TO REALIZE...
�That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew‑ baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. WE ARE CONSCIOUS OF THE INJURY WE DID WHEN WE IMPOSED UPON YOU OUR ALIEN FAITH AND TRADITIONS. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, WILL NEVER KNOW THE REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR CRIMES...
�You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. IT IS THE TRUTH, and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and IT IS simply A FACT THAT WE WERE THE PRIME MOVERS IN THE BOURGEOIS DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTIONS OF THE CENTURY BEFORE LAST, BOTH IN FRANCE AND AMERICA.
�If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age‑long political and social disabilities. They benefited us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti‑Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?� (Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York Tribune, �A Real Case Against the Jews,� in Century Magazine, January‑February, 1928)
Just as nowadays our brethren we obliged at their own risk to denounce to the kabal apostates of their own family or members who have been noticed doing anything in opposition to the kabal, so in our kingdom over all the world it will be obligatory for all our subjects to observe the duty of serve to the State in this direction.
Such an organization will extirpate abuses of authority, of force, of bribery, everything in fact which we by our counsels, by our theories of the superhuman rights of man, have introduced into the customs of the goyim...But how else were we to procure that increase of causes predisposing to disorders in the midst of their administration?... Among the number of those methods one of the most important is, agents for the restoration of order, so places as to have the opportunity in their disintegrating activity of developing and displaying their evil inclinations, obstinate self‑conceit, irresponsible exercise of authority, and, first and foremost, venality.
The very Christ, to whom they give lip service, warned us of them. In Matthew 24:24 and Mark 13:22 Yahshua warned us that one of the signs of the end of this age would be the coming of false prophets. They would teach a false Christ instead of the real one. This is exactly what we are seeing today on a vast scale.
The most outstanding example of this is an article in the May 18, 1965 issue of Look magazine. The director of The National Council of Churches� commission on Religion and Race makes a bitter and abusive attack upon the white race, supposedly in the name of religion! The article contains so many utterly false statements that we cannot let it go unchallenged. It is our purpose to take up his points one by one and prove how false they are.
The director of the NCC begins by making this astonishing statement.
�For years, most of our churches have aided and abetted the Anglo Saxon white conspiracy. If an indictment were to be prepared, it might very well read like this: The Christian churches have not influenced their adherents to practice racial justice in housing, education, job opportunity and public accommodations. The Christian churches, in their own internal life, have practiced discrimination and built barriers to prevent open membership in the very household of faith.�
Since this man appoints himself the supreme authority on what constitutes Christianity, we are entitled to test his knowledge of that subject. Of course the Anglo Saxon white Christians are proud of their race and want to keep it pure. We honor the equal right of the Negro and the Asiatic to be proud of their race, and want to keep it pure so that it will continue to have the qualities of which they are proud.
While we don�t condone the Black Muslim�s threat of violent revolution, we do respect them for their own self‑respect. They should be proud of being Negroes and don�t want to become an imitation of white men. In that spirit, they can accomplish wonders in raising the Negro to a level higher than he has ever attained in the past. However, we insist on that same right for ourselves. We want to be able to be proud of the white race and its accomplishments. The right to preserve it free from any mongrelization, which would forever destroy its present qualities.
For any man to call this basic right a conspiracy is crass impudence, which should not pass without rebuke. It is a fair example of the tactics of the extreme left in their infiltration and subversion of the white Christian culture. If the white race were the hardhearted monsters, which our enemies pretend we are, this tactic would be a total failure. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE THE WHITE RACE, ABOVE ALL OTHERS, IS CONSCIENTIOUS AND DEEPLY CONCERNED WITH BEING RIGHTEOUS IN ALL THEIR DEALINGS WITH OTHERS, THAT THESE INFILTRATORS CAN GIVE SOME OF OUR PEOPLE A GUILT COMPLEX BY MEANS OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS.
THE WHITE ANGLO-SAXONS HAVE A RECORD OF LOVE AND CHARITY, WHICH STANDS ABSOLUTELY ALONE IN ALL OF HISTORY. Find us just one black nation in all of Africa, which is pouring out its wealth to help others, even to help their fellow Negroes. Don�t tell us they are too poor to help anyone! Their vast mineral wealth, the plantations in their fertile soil, these produce wealth when the white man operated them. Remember, this was one of the favorite accusations of our professional bleeding hearts, that the white man was exploiting the wealth of Africa.
Find just one Asiatic nation, which is prodigally pouring out billions of dollars in aid to others, even to their fellow Asiatics. Don�t tell us they can�t do it. Japan is one of the world�s great industrial nations. The rice, rubber and tin of Southeast Asia brought in great wealth while the white man ran this area. China�s poverty is the obvious and inevitable fruit of the way the Chinese are running it. The British were accused of pumping great wealth out of India. Now the British are gone, why can�t the Hindus spread some of that immense wealth around, if they claim they are our equals? If there isn�t any wealth there, why and how can they falsely accuse the British of exploiting it?
Never make the mistake of doubting that this is a black revolution. The former Negro congressman, Adam Clayton Powell, said this about it.
�The white man is running scared. The whites won�t interfere with you. We are now in the majority in the world. The whites are afraid of us. The Negro has to learn how to fight. This is a black movement. It is ridiculous for the white man to try to lead the Negro. This is our land! The white Christians have made it what is. We stand in the middle of the black man�s revolution and make no mistake about it! This is a revolution. No black man should be anything but a fighter.�
CHRISTIANITY, AND THE TRUE CHURCH, HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE SOLID CORE AROUND WHICH OUR CIVILIZATION WAS BUILT. OUR PRESENT CIVILIZATION IS THE VISIBLE EXPRESSION OF THOSE IDEALS. LIKE ALL HUMAN EFFORTS, IT HAS SOME IMPERFECTIONS. HOWEVER, IT IS IN EVERY RESPECT THE HIGHEST CIVILIZATION THE WORLD HAS EVER KNOWN. NOT ONE OF ITS CRITICS WOULD LIKE TO LIVE ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD. This is the most eloquent testimony to the virtues we have developed.
THERE ARE THOSE WHO ARE TRYING TO REVERSE ALL OF OUR EFFORTS AND TAKE THIS CIVILIZATION OUT OF THE CONTROL OF THE WHITE MEN WHO CREATED IT. They want to give complete mastery to the various alien minority groups, who now hold the balance of power. These men also want to abolish the barriers, which have thus far prevented the large‑scale mongrelization and eternal destruction of the white race. Perhaps they have some fatuous notion there is some vague good in all of this. In truth, it is the height of wickedness.
Americans successfully resisted these attempts, to subvert our civilization, until a new weapon against us was discovered. This infiltrator�s weapon was the infiltration of our churches and under the guise of modernism, changes church doctrines until our clergy would constantly condemn our people for wanting to keep the good heritage, which Yahweh has given us. This tactic has been amazingly successful, because our ministers have long ago ceased to tell us what is in the Bible. They have only taught us the church doctrines of modernism, occasionally reinforced by a partial quotation of a single Bible verse, taken out of context. Then they apply this verse to something the Bible was not talking about.
This is not new; it is just a repeat performance of the same attack upon our religious beliefs. It is performed in the same way and with the same success as in the time of the prophet Jeremiah. In Jeremiah 5:30‑31 we were warned,
�A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land: the prophets prophesy falsely and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?�
A vision of this evil was also given to the prophet Ezekiel. Yahweh showed him how the corruption of the true religion had penetrated to the very temple itself, under the leadership of the priests. Then it brought upon them the Babylonian captivity as a punishment, just as in our own days the same evil will bring equally severe punishment. As Yahweh said in Jeremiah 12:10,
�Many pastors have destroyed My vineyard.�
How true this is today!
Let�s get back to the article in Look magazine dated May 18, 1965. The writer tries to make us believe that Yahshua wanted everyone jumbled together in an indiscriminate hash. The writer calls Yahshua, the head of the church, the friend of Samaritans, the destroyer of class distinctions of all kinds. Except for the words the head of the church, the other descriptions are totally false, as we will now prove.
First let�s take up the phrase, friend of Samaritans. The Bible only records two instances in which Yahshua had anything at all to do with Samaritans. One instance was recorded in Luke 17:12‑19 which tells that Yahshua healed a group of ten lepers, and one of the ten was a Samaritan.
The other incident recorded in John chapter 4, tells how Yahshua talked for a few minutes with a Samaritan woman who gave Him a drink of water. On the request of the Samaritans, who lived in the village, He stayed there for two days and preached to them. Does this make Him a friend of the Samaritans? Remember, Yahshua also preached to the Pharisees. Who will pretend that this shows that He was the friend of the Pharisees?
What does the Bible tell us about Yahshua�s real attitude toward the Samaritans? In Matthew 10:5‑6 we read that He sent out His 12 disciples on a preaching mission. He forbade them to even so much as enter a city of Samaria.
�These twelve Yahshua sent forth, and commanded them saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritan enter ye not: but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.�
By Yahshua�s express command, they were not to try to convert the Samaritans, but to take the message to the true Israelites.
Was Yahshua the destroyer of class distinctions of all kinds? Both Matthew 15:22‑28 and Mark 7:25‑29 record the incident of a woman of the Phoenician coast of Syria, who asked Yahshua to heal her daughter. She first appealed to Yahshua as Son of David, the way a true Israelite could appeal to Him. Matthew 15:23 records, �He answered her not a word.� When she still followed Him, asking for help, did He invite her to join the disciples? Definitely not! Yahshua refused her again saying,
�I am not sent but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel�.
When the woman still persisted, Yahshua told the woman that it was not proper to take the children�s bread and give it to dogs. Does that sound like the destroyer of class distinctions of all kinds? Not until she recognized and accepted her place, and acknowledged the good things of the kingdom of Yahweh, including healing of the sick, must first come to the true Israel.
After Israel, the benefits could come to the others when they were ready to accept them in the right spirit. Not until then did Yahshua heal her daughter. After Yahshua called the woman a dog, she answered him,
�Yes, master: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children�s crumbs. And he said unto her, For this saying, go thy way: the devil is gone out of thy daughter.�
You notice the woman did not become angry at being called a dog. Did she understand more than the present day ministers and priests do?
There is still more. Remember that every time the disciples traveled between Judea and Galilee, they passed through Samaria; there were a few Samaritans in Judea and Galilee also. Did this friend of the Samaritans seek to bring them into the church? Certainly not! In Matthew 7:6, Yahshua warned His disciples,
�Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.�
Yahshua wasn�t so foolish as to think His disciples were going out to the barnyard and preach to the four footed animals there. These dogs and swine, of which He spoke, were all the two‑footed varieties. They were men but not the kind of men who should be brought into His church on a basis of equal and indiscriminate fellowship.
The entire Bible record of Yahshua�s whole earthly life shows that He was carefully selective of those whom He brought into His church. The only exception was Judas Iscariot, and that was for the purpose of allowing the prophesies of Yahshua�s martyrdom to be carried out. Besides, it was a good lesson that if a Jew could walk with Yahshua for three years, and still betray Him, can we ever trust a Jew??
The writer of the article in Look magazine also makes the absurd statement,
�It is only by mutilating Christ that men can justify theories of racial superiority.�
Remember that Yahshua stood firmly upon the fact that He was not sent to anyone but the lost sheep of the house of Israel. If that is not the strongest theory of racial superiority, how could you make it any stronger?
Yes, these left wing modernists are ashamed of Yahshua�s own words, and they try to make a socialist out of Him. Yahshua gave them their answer in Mark 8:38.
�Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of Me and of My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed when he cometh in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.�
Believe us! We don�t envy these modernists their position, but it is one of their own choices! (Taken in part from a study, By Bertrand L. Comparet)